Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR
IEA conducted a System-wide Evaluation of Results Based Management to learn lessons from the experience of introducing and implementing different aspects of RBM in CGIAR. The objectives of the Evaluation were to provide evidence and lessons and recommendations as an input to implementing an RBM fram...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Evaluation Report |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108613 |
| _version_ | 1855517208276369408 |
|---|---|
| author | Vandenberg, Robert Wigboldus, Seerp |
| author_browse | Vandenberg, Robert Wigboldus, Seerp |
| author_facet | Vandenberg, Robert Wigboldus, Seerp |
| author_sort | Vandenberg, Robert |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | IEA conducted a System-wide Evaluation of Results Based Management to learn lessons from the experience of introducing and implementing different aspects of RBM in CGIAR. The objectives of the Evaluation were to provide evidence and lessons and recommendations as an input to implementing an RBM framework for CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs), and for increasing the relevance, efficiency, and effectiveness of further RBM iterations. On the basis of international experiences, the evaluation team formulated ten good practice principles for RBM applicable to CGIAR’s context and proposed a Theory of Change for RBM in CGIAR (presented below). Main Findings The Evaluation found that CGIAR lacked a shared conceptual understanding of RBM. At System-level, CGIAR saw RBM mainly in relation to the SRF and results-based reporting to donors; while Centers and CRPs sought to develop performance management systems for their own purposes, and for complex research programs. As a result, there has been confusion about the purpose of RBM for CGIAR. In addition, insufficient consideration was given to the fact that CGIAR is a research for development organization with a mandate to deliver research results. The Evaluation found, however, that many Centers have embraced their own RBM approaches over the years. Following the CGIAR reform, Centers and CRPs have shown significant progress in developing their RBM-related processes, tools, and methods, and a nascent culture shift has taken place towards performance management. Some are notably providing leadership from below to be applied at System level. |
| format | Evaluation Report |
| id | CGSpace108613 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateRange | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement |
| publisherStr | CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1086132023-10-25T10:15:12Z Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR Vandenberg, Robert Wigboldus, Seerp efficiency research evaluation system management cgiar agriculture IEA conducted a System-wide Evaluation of Results Based Management to learn lessons from the experience of introducing and implementing different aspects of RBM in CGIAR. The objectives of the Evaluation were to provide evidence and lessons and recommendations as an input to implementing an RBM framework for CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs), and for increasing the relevance, efficiency, and effectiveness of further RBM iterations. On the basis of international experiences, the evaluation team formulated ten good practice principles for RBM applicable to CGIAR’s context and proposed a Theory of Change for RBM in CGIAR (presented below). Main Findings The Evaluation found that CGIAR lacked a shared conceptual understanding of RBM. At System-level, CGIAR saw RBM mainly in relation to the SRF and results-based reporting to donors; while Centers and CRPs sought to develop performance management systems for their own purposes, and for complex research programs. As a result, there has been confusion about the purpose of RBM for CGIAR. In addition, insufficient consideration was given to the fact that CGIAR is a research for development organization with a mandate to deliver research results. The Evaluation found, however, that many Centers have embraced their own RBM approaches over the years. Following the CGIAR reform, Centers and CRPs have shown significant progress in developing their RBM-related processes, tools, and methods, and a nascent culture shift has taken place towards performance management. Some are notably providing leadership from below to be applied at System level. 2017 2020-06-28T16:28:24Z 2020-06-28T16:28:24Z Evaluation Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108613 en Open Access application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement CGIAR-IEA (2017), Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR, Final Report. Rome, Italy: Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) of CGIAR https://iaes.cgiar.org/ |
| spellingShingle | efficiency research evaluation system management cgiar agriculture Vandenberg, Robert Wigboldus, Seerp Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR |
| title | Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR |
| title_full | Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR |
| title_short | Evaluation of Results-Based Management in CGIAR |
| title_sort | evaluation of results based management in cgiar |
| topic | efficiency research evaluation system management cgiar agriculture |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108613 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbergrobert evaluationofresultsbasedmanagementincgiar AT wigboldusseerp evaluationofresultsbasedmanagementincgiar |