Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR
The Evaluation assessed capacity development (CD) activities across CGIAR at three levels: individual, organizational, and institutional (networks and policies). The Evaluation assessed capacity development (CD) activities across CGIAR at three levels: individual, organizational, and institutional...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Evaluation Report |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108611 |
| _version_ | 1855535918950121472 |
|---|---|
| author | Palenberg, Markus Rauniyar, Ganesh Thangata, Paul |
| author_browse | Palenberg, Markus Rauniyar, Ganesh Thangata, Paul |
| author_facet | Palenberg, Markus Rauniyar, Ganesh Thangata, Paul |
| author_sort | Palenberg, Markus |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The Evaluation assessed capacity development (CD) activities across CGIAR at three levels: individual, organizational, and institutional (networks and policies).
The Evaluation assessed capacity development (CD) activities across CGIAR at three levels: individual, organizational, and institutional (networks and policies). The main finding was that CGIAR continues to have a unique position in supporting individual capacity development of national scientists in developing countries. At the organizational and institutional level, several CGIAR Centers were found to have developed strong CD partnerships with NARS, but further efforts to enhance capacity of NARs in policy dialogues and development are needed. The Evaluation also found that that there was little evidence of the effectiveness of CD activities targeted at primary producers, and clear guidance is needed on CGIAR’s comparative advantage and how CD should be prioritized.
Recommendations included the need for better planning and design of CD activities based on CGIAR’s comparative advantages and strategic objectives, as many national partners are well placed to take on an active role on wide-scale CD at national levels. The Evaluation recommended that CGIAR program’s build CD into their Theories of Change, and plan for transitions to other providers. The Evaluation also recommended for CGIAR to develop well-defined data collection and reporting tools for measuring effectiveness and impact and to support learning and decision-making. |
| format | Evaluation Report |
| id | CGSpace108611 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateRange | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement |
| publisherStr | CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1086112023-10-25T10:23:15Z Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR Palenberg, Markus Rauniyar, Ganesh Thangata, Paul development policies networks capacity development evaluation cgiar activities levels The Evaluation assessed capacity development (CD) activities across CGIAR at three levels: individual, organizational, and institutional (networks and policies). The Evaluation assessed capacity development (CD) activities across CGIAR at three levels: individual, organizational, and institutional (networks and policies). The main finding was that CGIAR continues to have a unique position in supporting individual capacity development of national scientists in developing countries. At the organizational and institutional level, several CGIAR Centers were found to have developed strong CD partnerships with NARS, but further efforts to enhance capacity of NARs in policy dialogues and development are needed. The Evaluation also found that that there was little evidence of the effectiveness of CD activities targeted at primary producers, and clear guidance is needed on CGIAR’s comparative advantage and how CD should be prioritized. Recommendations included the need for better planning and design of CD activities based on CGIAR’s comparative advantages and strategic objectives, as many national partners are well placed to take on an active role on wide-scale CD at national levels. The Evaluation recommended that CGIAR program’s build CD into their Theories of Change, and plan for transitions to other providers. The Evaluation also recommended for CGIAR to develop well-defined data collection and reporting tools for measuring effectiveness and impact and to support learning and decision-making. 2017-08 2020-06-28T16:21:02Z 2020-06-28T16:21:02Z Evaluation Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108611 en Open Access application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement CGIAR Independent Evaluation Arrangement. 2017. Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR. Rome, Italy: Independent Evaluation Arrangement of CGIAR |
| spellingShingle | development policies networks capacity development evaluation cgiar activities levels Palenberg, Markus Rauniyar, Ganesh Thangata, Paul Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR |
| title | Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR |
| title_full | Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR |
| title_short | Evaluation of capacity development activities of CGIAR |
| title_sort | evaluation of capacity development activities of cgiar |
| topic | development policies networks capacity development evaluation cgiar activities levels |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108611 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT palenbergmarkus evaluationofcapacitydevelopmentactivitiesofcgiar AT rauniyarganesh evaluationofcapacitydevelopmentactivitiesofcgiar AT thangatapaul evaluationofcapacitydevelopmentactivitiesofcgiar |