Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi

In southern Africa the repeated cultivation of maize (Zea mays) and climate variability (especially frequent and extended droughts) have created conditions favouring parasitic weed infestation (e.g., Striga asiatica). In the past decade, Striga has reduced maize yields for smallholder farmers (culti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silberg, T.R., Richardson, R.B., López, M.C.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/107032
_version_ 1855531685344444416
author Silberg, T.R.
Richardson, R.B.
López, M.C.
author_browse López, M.C.
Richardson, R.B.
Silberg, T.R.
author_facet Silberg, T.R.
Richardson, R.B.
López, M.C.
author_sort Silberg, T.R.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description In southern Africa the repeated cultivation of maize (Zea mays) and climate variability (especially frequent and extended droughts) have created conditions favouring parasitic weed infestation (e.g., Striga asiatica). In the past decade, Striga has reduced maize yields for smallholder farmers (cultivating less than two hectares), not only in southern Africa, but across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Parasitism of maize by Striga leads to significant grain yield losses. Intercropping legumes within maize-based systems has been shown to decrease Striga infestation and improve food security. Before cultivating these cropping systems, farmers consider different attributes associated with them (e.g., efforts or cost of inputs). Understanding farmers’ preferences for these attributes generates insights as how to increase adoption of intercropping as a Striga control practice. We use discrete choice experiments to identify the trade-offs which Malawian farmers are willing to accept among the attributes of choice scenarios for Striga control practices. Results indicate that farmers are willing (and in some cases unwilling) to sacrifice different fractions of maize yield for suppression of Striga, labour intensity, soil fertility and intercropped legume yield. Male and female farmers have heterogeneous preferences for these attributes. These findings have significant implications for Striga management and its effect on a crop that sustains the livelihoods of more than 80% of Malawians.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace107032
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1070322024-11-15T08:52:46Z Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi Silberg, T.R. Richardson, R.B. López, M.C. intercropping legumes striga gender intensification farming systems In southern Africa the repeated cultivation of maize (Zea mays) and climate variability (especially frequent and extended droughts) have created conditions favouring parasitic weed infestation (e.g., Striga asiatica). In the past decade, Striga has reduced maize yields for smallholder farmers (cultivating less than two hectares), not only in southern Africa, but across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Parasitism of maize by Striga leads to significant grain yield losses. Intercropping legumes within maize-based systems has been shown to decrease Striga infestation and improve food security. Before cultivating these cropping systems, farmers consider different attributes associated with them (e.g., efforts or cost of inputs). Understanding farmers’ preferences for these attributes generates insights as how to increase adoption of intercropping as a Striga control practice. We use discrete choice experiments to identify the trade-offs which Malawian farmers are willing to accept among the attributes of choice scenarios for Striga control practices. Results indicate that farmers are willing (and in some cases unwilling) to sacrifice different fractions of maize yield for suppression of Striga, labour intensity, soil fertility and intercropped legume yield. Male and female farmers have heterogeneous preferences for these attributes. These findings have significant implications for Striga management and its effect on a crop that sustains the livelihoods of more than 80% of Malawians. 2020-04 2020-02-11T11:58:38Z 2020-02-11T11:58:38Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/107032 en Limited Access Springer Silberg, T.R., Richardson, R.B. and Lopez, M.C. 2020. Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi. Food Security
spellingShingle intercropping
legumes
striga
gender
intensification
farming systems
Silberg, T.R.
Richardson, R.B.
López, M.C.
Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi
title Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi
title_full Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi
title_fullStr Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi
title_short Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi
title_sort maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce striga in malawi
topic intercropping
legumes
striga
gender
intensification
farming systems
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/107032
work_keys_str_mv AT silbergtr maizefarmerpreferencesforintercroppingsystemstoreducestrigainmalawi
AT richardsonrb maizefarmerpreferencesforintercroppingsystemstoreducestrigainmalawi
AT lopezmc maizefarmerpreferencesforintercroppingsystemstoreducestrigainmalawi