Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions
This tool describes case studies of gender implications in mechanization in RTB crops, illustrating both positive and negative outcomes. GENNOVATE research has shown that the beneficiaries of mechanization tend to be the wealthier rather than the poorer farmers and more often men than women. However...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Brief |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Potato Center
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106756 |
| _version_ | 1855516256472399872 |
|---|---|
| author | Kawarazuka, Nozomi Prain, Gordon Forsythe, L. Mayanja, S. Mudege, Netsayi N. Babini, C. Polar, Vivian |
| author_browse | Babini, C. Forsythe, L. Kawarazuka, Nozomi Mayanja, S. Mudege, Netsayi N. Polar, Vivian Prain, Gordon |
| author_facet | Kawarazuka, Nozomi Prain, Gordon Forsythe, L. Mayanja, S. Mudege, Netsayi N. Babini, C. Polar, Vivian |
| author_sort | Kawarazuka, Nozomi |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | This tool describes case studies of gender implications in mechanization in RTB crops, illustrating both positive and negative outcomes. GENNOVATE research has shown that the beneficiaries of mechanization tend to be the wealthier rather than the poorer farmers and more often men than women. However, results also reveal that women have strong interest in mechanization as a way to improve their own circumstances. |
| format | Brief |
| id | CGSpace106756 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateRange | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | International Potato Center |
| publisherStr | International Potato Center |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1067562025-11-06T13:59:47Z Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions Kawarazuka, Nozomi Prain, Gordon Forsythe, L. Mayanja, S. Mudege, Netsayi N. Babini, C. Polar, Vivian gender women agriculture This tool describes case studies of gender implications in mechanization in RTB crops, illustrating both positive and negative outcomes. GENNOVATE research has shown that the beneficiaries of mechanization tend to be the wealthier rather than the poorer farmers and more often men than women. However, results also reveal that women have strong interest in mechanization as a way to improve their own circumstances. 2018-03 2020-01-28T05:33:17Z 2020-01-28T05:33:17Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106756 en Open Access application/pdf International Potato Center Kawarazuka, N., Prain, Gordon, Forsythe, L., Mayanja, S., Mudege, N.N., Babini, C., Polar, V. (2018). Gender in Agricultural Mechanization: Key guiding questions. Lima, Peru: CIP. |
| spellingShingle | gender women agriculture Kawarazuka, Nozomi Prain, Gordon Forsythe, L. Mayanja, S. Mudege, Netsayi N. Babini, C. Polar, Vivian Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions |
| title | Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions |
| title_full | Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions |
| title_fullStr | Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions |
| title_short | Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions |
| title_sort | gender in agricultural mechanization key guiding questions |
| topic | gender women agriculture |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106756 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kawarazukanozomi genderinagriculturalmechanizationkeyguidingquestions AT praingordon genderinagriculturalmechanizationkeyguidingquestions AT forsythel genderinagriculturalmechanizationkeyguidingquestions AT mayanjas genderinagriculturalmechanizationkeyguidingquestions AT mudegenetsayin genderinagriculturalmechanizationkeyguidingquestions AT babinic genderinagriculturalmechanizationkeyguidingquestions AT polarvivian genderinagriculturalmechanizationkeyguidingquestions |