A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps
Global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems aim to provide up-to-date information regarding food production to different actors and decision makers in support of global and national food security. To help reduce price volatility of the kind experienced between 2007 and 2011, a global s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105629 |
| _version_ | 1855530682004013056 |
|---|---|
| author | Fritz, Steffen See, Linda Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso Waldner, François Jacques, Damien Becker-Reshef, Inbal Whitcraft, Alyssa Baruth, Bettina Bonifacio, Rogerio Crutchfield, Jim Rembold, Felix Rojas, Oscar Schucknecht, Anne Velde, Marijn van der Verdin, James Wuk, Bingfang Yank, Nana You, Liangzhi Gilliams, Sven Mücher, Sander Tetrault, Robert Moorthy, Inian McCallum, Ian |
| author_browse | Baruth, Bettina Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso Becker-Reshef, Inbal Bonifacio, Rogerio Crutchfield, Jim Fritz, Steffen Gilliams, Sven Jacques, Damien McCallum, Ian Moorthy, Inian Mücher, Sander Rembold, Felix Rojas, Oscar Schucknecht, Anne See, Linda Tetrault, Robert Velde, Marijn van der Verdin, James Waldner, François Whitcraft, Alyssa Wuk, Bingfang Yank, Nana You, Liangzhi |
| author_facet | Fritz, Steffen See, Linda Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso Waldner, François Jacques, Damien Becker-Reshef, Inbal Whitcraft, Alyssa Baruth, Bettina Bonifacio, Rogerio Crutchfield, Jim Rembold, Felix Rojas, Oscar Schucknecht, Anne Velde, Marijn van der Verdin, James Wuk, Bingfang Yank, Nana You, Liangzhi Gilliams, Sven Mücher, Sander Tetrault, Robert Moorthy, Inian McCallum, Ian |
| author_sort | Fritz, Steffen |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems aim to provide up-to-date information regarding food production to different actors and decision makers in support of global and national food security. To help reduce price volatility of the kind experienced between 2007 and 2011, a global system of agricultural monitoring systems is needed to ensure the coordinated flow of information in a timely manner for early warning purposes. A number of systems now exist that fill this role. This paper provides an overview of the eight main global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems currently in operation and compares them based on the input data and models used, the outputs produced and other characteristics such as the role of the analyst, their interaction with other systems and the geographical scale at which they operate. Despite improvements in access to high resolution satellite imagery over the last decade and the use of numerous remote-sensing based products by the different systems, there are still fundamental gaps. Based on a questionnaire, discussions with the system experts and the literature, we present the main gaps in the data and in the methods. Finally, we propose some recommendations for addressing these gaps through ongoing improvements in remote sensing, harnessing new and innovative data streams and the continued sharing of more and more data. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace105629 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateRange | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1056292025-11-12T04:47:36Z A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps Fritz, Steffen See, Linda Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso Waldner, François Jacques, Damien Becker-Reshef, Inbal Whitcraft, Alyssa Baruth, Bettina Bonifacio, Rogerio Crutchfield, Jim Rembold, Felix Rojas, Oscar Schucknecht, Anne Velde, Marijn van der Verdin, James Wuk, Bingfang Yank, Nana You, Liangzhi Gilliams, Sven Mücher, Sander Tetrault, Robert Moorthy, Inian McCallum, Ian crop production crop calendar yields earth observation satellites spatial data data remote sensing global observing systems agriculture monitoring techniques Global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems aim to provide up-to-date information regarding food production to different actors and decision makers in support of global and national food security. To help reduce price volatility of the kind experienced between 2007 and 2011, a global system of agricultural monitoring systems is needed to ensure the coordinated flow of information in a timely manner for early warning purposes. A number of systems now exist that fill this role. This paper provides an overview of the eight main global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems currently in operation and compares them based on the input data and models used, the outputs produced and other characteristics such as the role of the analyst, their interaction with other systems and the geographical scale at which they operate. Despite improvements in access to high resolution satellite imagery over the last decade and the use of numerous remote-sensing based products by the different systems, there are still fundamental gaps. Based on a questionnaire, discussions with the system experts and the literature, we present the main gaps in the data and in the methods. Finally, we propose some recommendations for addressing these gaps through ongoing improvements in remote sensing, harnessing new and innovative data streams and the continued sharing of more and more data. 2019-01 2019-11-05T04:42:31Z 2019-11-05T04:42:31Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105629 en Open Access application/pdf Elsevier Fritz, Steffen; See, Linda; Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso; Waldner, François; Jacques, Damien; Becker-Reshef, Inbal; Whitcraft, Alyssa; Baruth, Bettina; Bonifacio, Rogerio; Crutchfield, Jim; Rembold, Felix; Rojas, Oscar; Schucknecht, Anne; Van der Velde, Marijn; Verdin, James; Wuk, Bingfang; Yank, Nana; You, Liangzhi; Gilliams, Sven; Mücher, Sander; Tetrault, Robert; Moorthy, Inian; McCallum, Ian. 2019. A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps. Agricultural systems.168(2019):258-272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.010 |
| spellingShingle | crop production crop calendar yields earth observation satellites spatial data data remote sensing global observing systems agriculture monitoring techniques Fritz, Steffen See, Linda Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso Waldner, François Jacques, Damien Becker-Reshef, Inbal Whitcraft, Alyssa Baruth, Bettina Bonifacio, Rogerio Crutchfield, Jim Rembold, Felix Rojas, Oscar Schucknecht, Anne Velde, Marijn van der Verdin, James Wuk, Bingfang Yank, Nana You, Liangzhi Gilliams, Sven Mücher, Sander Tetrault, Robert Moorthy, Inian McCallum, Ian A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps |
| title | A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps |
| title_full | A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps |
| title_short | A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps |
| title_sort | comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps |
| topic | crop production crop calendar yields earth observation satellites spatial data data remote sensing global observing systems agriculture monitoring techniques |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105629 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fritzsteffen acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT seelinda acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT bayasjuancarloslaso acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT waldnerfrancois acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT jacquesdamien acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT beckerreshefinbal acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT whitcraftalyssa acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT baruthbettina acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT bonifaciorogerio acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT crutchfieldjim acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT remboldfelix acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT rojasoscar acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT schucknechtanne acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT veldemarijnvander acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT verdinjames acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT wukbingfang acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT yanknana acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT youliangzhi acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT gilliamssven acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT muchersander acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT tetraultrobert acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT moorthyinian acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT mccallumian acomparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT fritzsteffen comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT seelinda comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT bayasjuancarloslaso comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT waldnerfrancois comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT jacquesdamien comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT beckerreshefinbal comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT whitcraftalyssa comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT baruthbettina comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT bonifaciorogerio comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT crutchfieldjim comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT remboldfelix comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT rojasoscar comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT schucknechtanne comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT veldemarijnvander comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT verdinjames comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT wukbingfang comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT yanknana comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT youliangzhi comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT gilliamssven comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT muchersander comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT tetraultrobert comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT moorthyinian comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps AT mccallumian comparisonofglobalagriculturalmonitoringsystemsandcurrentgaps |