Resilience reconciled
Resilience scholarship continues to inspire opaque discourse and competing frameworks often inconsistent with the complexity inherent in social–ecological systems. We contend that competing conceptualizations of resilience are reconcilable, and that the core theory is useful for navigating sustain...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105445 |
Ejemplares similares: Resilience reconciled
- Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses
- Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
- Local food system resilience in the context of shocks and crises: vulnerabilities and responses of agroecology-based farmers in Peru, Germany, and the United States
- The role of agricultural biodiversity in strengthening resilience to climate change: towards an analytical framework
- Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture
- Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia