A call for inclusive conservation

An age-old conflict around a seemingly simple question has resurfaced: why do we conserve nature? Contention around this issue has come and gone many times, but in the past several years we believe that it has reappeared as an increasingly acrimonious debate between, in essence, those who argue that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tallis, H., Lubchenco, J., DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105104
_version_ 1855530846888394752
author Tallis, H.
Lubchenco, J.
DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
author_browse DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
Lubchenco, J.
Tallis, H.
author_facet Tallis, H.
Lubchenco, J.
DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
author_sort Tallis, H.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description An age-old conflict around a seemingly simple question has resurfaced: why do we conserve nature? Contention around this issue has come and gone many times, but in the past several years we believe that it has reappeared as an increasingly acrimonious debate between, in essence, those who argue that nature should be protected for its own sake (intrinsic value)1, 2 and those who argue that we must also save nature to help ourselves (instrumental value).
format Journal Article
id CGSpace105104
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
publisherStr Nature Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1051042025-11-12T05:44:31Z A call for inclusive conservation Tallis, H. Lubchenco, J. DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. ecology environmental policies environmental protection natural resources An age-old conflict around a seemingly simple question has resurfaced: why do we conserve nature? Contention around this issue has come and gone many times, but in the past several years we believe that it has reappeared as an increasingly acrimonious debate between, in essence, those who argue that nature should be protected for its own sake (intrinsic value)1, 2 and those who argue that we must also save nature to help ourselves (instrumental value). 2014 2019-10-15T15:44:40Z 2019-10-15T15:44:40Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105104 en Open Access application/pdf Nature Publishing Group Tallis, H.; Lubchenco, J.; and 238 co-signatories (DeClerck, F.) (2014) A call for inclusive conservation. n. p. 27-28
spellingShingle ecology
environmental policies
environmental protection
natural resources
Tallis, H.
Lubchenco, J.
DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
A call for inclusive conservation
title A call for inclusive conservation
title_full A call for inclusive conservation
title_fullStr A call for inclusive conservation
title_full_unstemmed A call for inclusive conservation
title_short A call for inclusive conservation
title_sort call for inclusive conservation
topic ecology
environmental policies
environmental protection
natural resources
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105104
work_keys_str_mv AT tallish acallforinclusiveconservation
AT lubchencoj acallforinclusiveconservation
AT declerckfabriceaj acallforinclusiveconservation
AT tallish callforinclusiveconservation
AT lubchencoj callforinclusiveconservation
AT declerckfabriceaj callforinclusiveconservation