Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019)

Dear Editor We read with great interest the recently published study in Agronomy Journal in which use of native Aspergillus flavus strains as biocontrol agents was described as an effective strategy to limit aflatoxin contamination of maize (Molo et al., 34). The Molo et al. (34) study was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortega Beltran, A., Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/103758
_version_ 1855514274515910656
author Ortega Beltran, A.
Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit
author_browse Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit
Ortega Beltran, A.
author_facet Ortega Beltran, A.
Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit
author_sort Ortega Beltran, A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Dear Editor We read with great interest the recently published study in Agronomy Journal in which use of native Aspergillus flavus strains as biocontrol agents was described as an effective strategy to limit aflatoxin contamination of maize (Molo et al., 34). The Molo et al. (34) study was conducted during a single season, in a single field of a research station in the state of North Carolina. Yet, the authors, in our opinion, make nonrigorous comments and conclusions related to this important biocontrol technology. We also have read online news articles—one in the web portal of the American Society of Agronomy—related to Molo et al. (34) in which it is implied that the use of native atoxigenic strains to limit crop aflatoxin content is a novel concept (Chakravorty, 13; Fisk, 25). Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines novel as, “new and not resembling something formerly known or used”. The concept of native atoxigenic strains to limit crop aflatoxin content was introduced in the late 1980s (Cole and Cotty, 14; Cotty, 15) and even discussed in a 2010 article (Burness Communications, 11) by one web portal also providing commentary on Molo et al. (34) (American Society of Agronomy, 3). Molo et al. (34) and the online news commentaries on the article provide readers inaccurate interpretations of the status of aflatoxin biocontrol technology across the globe. The article leaves the impression that use of native atoxigenic strains is new, whereas this concept is one of the bases of aflatoxin management through biocontrol with atoxigenic A. flavus active ingredients (Mehl et al., 33) and use of native atoxigenic strains is mentioned in the title of a patent issued in 1992 by the US government (Cotty, 16). The first reports of native atoxigenic strain efficacy in cotton (Cotty, 17, 18) and maize (Brown et al., 10) were made almost three decades ago, and benefits of using native atoxigenic strains mentioned in the news commentaries in terms of soil and climate adaptation are concepts stressed in several publications (Cotty, 20; Probst et al., 42; Mehl et al., 33; Atehnkeng et al., 5, 4; Bandyopadhyay et al., 8). Results of Molo et al. (34) should be considered as a preliminary indication that native atoxigenic strains are also beneficial for limiting maize aflatoxin content in North Carolina.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace103758
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1037582025-11-11T10:02:00Z Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019) Ortega Beltran, A. Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit maize aflatoxins aspergillus flavus mycotoxins yields Dear Editor We read with great interest the recently published study in Agronomy Journal in which use of native Aspergillus flavus strains as biocontrol agents was described as an effective strategy to limit aflatoxin contamination of maize (Molo et al., 34). The Molo et al. (34) study was conducted during a single season, in a single field of a research station in the state of North Carolina. Yet, the authors, in our opinion, make nonrigorous comments and conclusions related to this important biocontrol technology. We also have read online news articles—one in the web portal of the American Society of Agronomy—related to Molo et al. (34) in which it is implied that the use of native atoxigenic strains to limit crop aflatoxin content is a novel concept (Chakravorty, 13; Fisk, 25). Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines novel as, “new and not resembling something formerly known or used”. The concept of native atoxigenic strains to limit crop aflatoxin content was introduced in the late 1980s (Cole and Cotty, 14; Cotty, 15) and even discussed in a 2010 article (Burness Communications, 11) by one web portal also providing commentary on Molo et al. (34) (American Society of Agronomy, 3). Molo et al. (34) and the online news commentaries on the article provide readers inaccurate interpretations of the status of aflatoxin biocontrol technology across the globe. The article leaves the impression that use of native atoxigenic strains is new, whereas this concept is one of the bases of aflatoxin management through biocontrol with atoxigenic A. flavus active ingredients (Mehl et al., 33) and use of native atoxigenic strains is mentioned in the title of a patent issued in 1992 by the US government (Cotty, 16). The first reports of native atoxigenic strain efficacy in cotton (Cotty, 17, 18) and maize (Brown et al., 10) were made almost three decades ago, and benefits of using native atoxigenic strains mentioned in the news commentaries in terms of soil and climate adaptation are concepts stressed in several publications (Cotty, 20; Probst et al., 42; Mehl et al., 33; Atehnkeng et al., 5, 4; Bandyopadhyay et al., 8). Results of Molo et al. (34) should be considered as a preliminary indication that native atoxigenic strains are also beneficial for limiting maize aflatoxin content in North Carolina. 2019-09 2019-09-26T10:03:53Z 2019-09-26T10:03:53Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/103758 en Open Access application/pdf Wiley Ortega-Beltran, A. & Bandyopadhyay, R. (2019). Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019). Agronomy Journal, 111(5), 2625-2631.
spellingShingle maize
aflatoxins
aspergillus flavus
mycotoxins
yields
Ortega Beltran, A.
Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit
Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019)
title Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019)
title_full Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019)
title_fullStr Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019)
title_full_unstemmed Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019)
title_short Comments on "Trial summary on the comparison of various non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus on Mycotoxin levels and yield in maize" by M.S. Molo, et al. Agron. J. 111:942-946 (2019)
title_sort comments on trial summary on the comparison of various non aflatoxigenic strains of aspergillus flavus on mycotoxin levels and yield in maize by m s molo et al agron j 111 942 946 2019
topic maize
aflatoxins
aspergillus flavus
mycotoxins
yields
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/103758
work_keys_str_mv AT ortegabeltrana commentsontrialsummaryonthecomparisonofvariousnonaflatoxigenicstrainsofaspergillusflavusonmycotoxinlevelsandyieldinmaizebymsmoloetalagronj1119429462019
AT bandyopadhyayranajit commentsontrialsummaryonthecomparisonofvariousnonaflatoxigenicstrainsofaspergillusflavusonmycotoxinlevelsandyieldinmaizebymsmoloetalagronj1119429462019