The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy
Expectations that gender‐mainstreaming efforts would effectively advance gender equality have been disappointed in contemporary sub‐Saharan Africa. Examining this apparent disconnect, we focus on the narratives through which policy‐makers relate to, and dis/engage with, gender issues. Using in‐depth...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/102392 |
| _version_ | 1855540337749000192 |
|---|---|
| author | Acosta, Mariola Wessel, Margit van Bommel, Severine van Ampaire, Edidah L. Jassogne, Laurence T.P. Feindt, Peter |
| author_browse | Acosta, Mariola Ampaire, Edidah L. Bommel, Severine van Feindt, Peter Jassogne, Laurence T.P. Wessel, Margit van |
| author_facet | Acosta, Mariola Wessel, Margit van Bommel, Severine van Ampaire, Edidah L. Jassogne, Laurence T.P. Feindt, Peter |
| author_sort | Acosta, Mariola |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Expectations that gender‐mainstreaming efforts would effectively advance gender equality have been disappointed in contemporary sub‐Saharan Africa. Examining this apparent disconnect, we focus on the narratives through which policy‐makers relate to, and dis/engage with, gender issues. Using in‐depth interviews and stakeholder meetings, our multi‐step analysis identifies story episodes from which we reconstruct stories and narratives. The analysis reveals a complex ecology of 22 stories, clustered in five main narratives. While most stories unfold a gender equality narrative, four competing narratives emerge. Shifts during conversations from the gender equality to other narratives reveal that the discursive engagement with gender mainstreaming is accompanied by simultaneous resistance, deconstruction and revocation. These narrative shifts exercise four distinct power effects: They (1) shift blame for ineffective gender implementation; (2) legitimize policy inaction; (3) foreground and naturalize patriarchy; and (4) promote the diversion of resources. The implicit communicative strategies exercise power through ideas (persuade listeners that the equality narrative is inappropriate), power over ideas (gender equality ideas are rejected or frustrated) and power in ideas (entrenched patriarchy ideas are reproduced). Attention to ideational power through policy narrative contributes to explain implementation issues with gender mainstreaming in Uganda, and is likely to be relevant beyond this case. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace102392 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| publisherStr | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1023922025-02-20T11:27:32Z The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy Acosta, Mariola Wessel, Margit van Bommel, Severine van Ampaire, Edidah L. Jassogne, Laurence T.P. Feindt, Peter climate change agriculture food security gender policies Expectations that gender‐mainstreaming efforts would effectively advance gender equality have been disappointed in contemporary sub‐Saharan Africa. Examining this apparent disconnect, we focus on the narratives through which policy‐makers relate to, and dis/engage with, gender issues. Using in‐depth interviews and stakeholder meetings, our multi‐step analysis identifies story episodes from which we reconstruct stories and narratives. The analysis reveals a complex ecology of 22 stories, clustered in five main narratives. While most stories unfold a gender equality narrative, four competing narratives emerge. Shifts during conversations from the gender equality to other narratives reveal that the discursive engagement with gender mainstreaming is accompanied by simultaneous resistance, deconstruction and revocation. These narrative shifts exercise four distinct power effects: They (1) shift blame for ineffective gender implementation; (2) legitimize policy inaction; (3) foreground and naturalize patriarchy; and (4) promote the diversion of resources. The implicit communicative strategies exercise power through ideas (persuade listeners that the equality narrative is inappropriate), power over ideas (gender equality ideas are rejected or frustrated) and power in ideas (entrenched patriarchy ideas are reproduced). Attention to ideational power through policy narrative contributes to explain implementation issues with gender mainstreaming in Uganda, and is likely to be relevant beyond this case. 2020-09 2019-07-31T13:56:59Z 2019-07-31T13:56:59Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/102392 en Open Access Wiley Acosta M, van Wessel M, van Bommel S, Ampaire EL, Jassogne L, Feindt PH. 2019. The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy. Development Policy Review |
| spellingShingle | climate change agriculture food security gender policies Acosta, Mariola Wessel, Margit van Bommel, Severine van Ampaire, Edidah L. Jassogne, Laurence T.P. Feindt, Peter The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy |
| title | The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy |
| title_full | The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy |
| title_fullStr | The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy |
| title_full_unstemmed | The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy |
| title_short | The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda's climate change policy |
| title_sort | power of narratives explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in uganda s climate change policy |
| topic | climate change agriculture food security gender policies |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/102392 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT acostamariola thepowerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT wesselmargitvan thepowerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT bommelseverinevan thepowerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT ampaireedidahl thepowerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT jassognelaurencetp thepowerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT feindtpeter thepowerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT acostamariola powerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT wesselmargitvan powerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT bommelseverinevan powerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT ampaireedidahl powerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT jassognelaurencetp powerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy AT feindtpeter powerofnarrativesexplaininginactionongendermainstreaminginugandasclimatechangepolicy |