Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
As the international community increases investment in agricultural adaptation to climate change in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is increasing demand to extract generalized knowledge claims about vulnerability from individual studies. If synthesis is to successfully produce sound g...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101245 |
Similar Items: Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
- Systematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation’ in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability Research
- Writing for Publication! Training, coaching, and peer-to-peer learning to write and publish a peer-reviewed article: Post-training report
- A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change in developing country agriculture
- Feeding the World Sustainably: Reflections Issues, and Suggestions
- Review and reflection on of PABRA achievements 2009 to 2012
- SAPLING outcomes: Reflection and synthesis report for Tanzania