Resultados de búsqueda - Statutory rape~

  • Mostrando 1 - 7 Resultados de 7
Limitar resultados
  1. Priority General Authorisations in rights-based water use authorisation in South Africa por van Koppen, Barbara, Schreiner, B.

    Publicado 2014
    “…Three forms of injustices are identified for small-scale water users who typically encompass all poor water users: the reinforcement of the historical injustices by which colonial powers captured ownership of water resources and undermined customary water law; administrative discrimination as a result of governments’ lack of capacity to license the large numbers of small-scale users; and discrimination of the smallest-scale users whose exemption from the obligation to apply for a licence relegates them to a second-class entitlement to water. Based on the texts and implementation experiences of the National Water Act (1998) and the pro-poor prioritisation rules in the National Water Resource Strategy-2 (2013), the authors propose the transformative legal tool of priority General Authorisations for black small-scale users to overcome these injustices. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Journal Article
  2. Water rights and multiple water uses: framework and application to Kirindi Oya irrigation system, Sri Lanka por Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S., Bakker, Margaretha

    Publicado 2000
    “…These overlapping uses bring in different government agencies, as well as different sets of norms and rules related to water. This paper provides a framework for examining the statutory and customary water rights of multiple users of water and applies it in the Kirindi Oya irrigation system in Sri Lanka, based on a multidisciplinary study conducted in 1997-1998. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Artículo preliminar
  3. Finding the right institutional and legal framework for community-based natural forest management: the Tanzanian case por Wily, L.

    Publicado 1997
    “…This publication looks specifically at Tanzania, where forest-local communities are beginning to be designated as the management authority of particular woodlands and, in some cases, even their owners. Positive results are giving considerable support to community-based management as the forest management strategy of choice. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Libro
  4. “It doesn’t matter at all—we are family”: Titling and joint property rights in Myanmar por Lambrecht, Isabel B., Synt, Nang Lun Kham, Ei Win, Hnin, Mahrt, Kristi, Win, Khin Zin

    Publicado 2024
    “…Several governments in low-, middle- and high-income countries have therefore imposed joint rights through modifications of statutory law or mandatory joint property registration. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Journal Article
  5. Regulating forestry: experience with compliance and enforcement over the 25 years of Tasmania's forest practices system por Wilkinson, G.R, Schofield, M, Kanowski, P.

    Publicado 2014
    “…Tasmania's forest practices system, one of the most prescriptive globally and the most comprehensive in Australia, has evolved over the last 25 years in response to public demands for high standards of governance, accountability and transparency of forest regulation on both public and private lands.The system was developed in the context of strong contestation, in Tasmanian and Australian civil society and politics, about appropriate forest policies and practices in Tasmania.The system is governed by a Forest Practices Act, which provides for a co-regulatory approach administered by an independent statutory body, the Forest Practices Authority.All forest operations must be undertaken in accordance with a certified forest practices plan, prepared and certified by accredited Forest Practices Officers employed by forest managers.These co-regulatory components of the system are supported by independent monitoring and enforcement by the Forest Practices Authority.This paper describes the genesis and evolution of the Tasmanian forest practices system, and summarises the range of measures employed to foster high levels of compliance, with an emphasis on training and education, self-monitoring and reporting by the industry, independent monitoring by the Forest Practices Authority, and corrective actions, backed by enforcement provisions.Compliance monitoring over 27 years demonstrates rapid improvement in the decade following establishment of the system, with consistently high levels of achievement subsequently.However, larger corporate forest managers consistently achieve higher rates of compliance than do small-scale forest owners, and redressing this imbalance has been a recurrent theme in Tasmania's forest practices system.Experience of implementation of Tasmania's forest practices system suggests that well-designed and implemented co-regulatory approaches, with high levels of transparency, can be effective in delivery of good technical standards of forest practices and high levels of compliance.However, these will not in themselves mitigate public concern about forest management practices unless the policies governing those practices have broad support in civil society.…”
    Enlace del recurso
    Journal Article

Herramientas de búsqueda: