Search Results - Science Research Methodology.

  1. Innovative Finance: Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working by CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service

    Published 2025
    “…This brief summarizes key findings from an evaluative learning report on one of CGIAR’s Way of Working on innovative finance as a mechanism to support delivery of its research and innovation agenda. The methodology is based primarily on a structured desk review of internal and external evidence, including The Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)-led evaluations; Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) and Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) reviews, center- and Board-led evaluations, inception reports from the 2025–30 CGIAR Research and Innovation Portfolio, and relevant external literature. …”
    Get full text
    Brief
  2. Systems Transformation and Multiple Pathways: Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working by CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service

    Published 2025
    “…It examines CGIAR’s progress toward more integrated, systems-oriented research and innovation. The methodology is based primarily on a structured desk review of internal and external evidence, including The Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)-led evaluations; Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) and Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) reviews, center- and Board-led evaluations, inception reports from the 2025–30 CGIAR Research and Innovation Portfolio, and relevant external literature. …”
    Get full text
    Brief
  3. Risk Management and Resilience: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working by CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service

    Published 2025
    “…This brief summarizes key findings from an evaluative learning report on one of CGIAR’s Way of Working on targeting risk management and resilience as essential qualities of food, land, and water systems. The methodology is based primarily on a structured desk review of internal and external evidence, including The Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)-led evaluations; Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) and Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) reviews, center- and Board-led evaluations, inception reports from the 2025–30 CGIAR Research and Innovation Portfolio, and relevant external literature. …”
    Get full text
    Brief
  4. Climate change impacts on crop breeding: Targeting interacting biotic and abiotic stresses for wheat improvement by Robles-Zazueta, Carlos A., Crespo-Herrera, Leonardo A., Piñera Chavez, Francisco J., Rivera Amado, A. Carolina, Aradottir, Gudbjorg I.

    Published 2024
    “…Here, we argue that biotic and abiotic stress interactions, and the genetics and genomics underlying them, have been insufficiently addressed by the crop science community. We propose this as a reason for the limited transfer of practical and feasible climate adaptation knowledge from research projects into routine farming practice. …”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. Interaktioner mellan människa och tamkatt (Felis silvestris catus) by Pålsson, Olivia

    Published 2020
    “…However, research processing the effects of the human-cat interactions is uncertain due to both positive and negative results around health benefits, stress, social needs and support. …”
    Get full text
    First cycle, G2E
  6. Stability-and-peace accelerator: concept note by Dahl, Hauke, Jacobs-Mata, Inga, Hulbert, S., Shehata, J.

    Published 2023
    “…IWMI has pioneered and expanded methods around science-driven business acceleration and scaling in multilateral projects as well as the OneCG portfolio (AICCRA, Ukama Ustawi, WE4F) and is adapting the end-to-end methodology to scale CGIAR research innovation, tools and knowledge through private sector innovators in a humanitarian, development and peace context. …”
    Get full text
    Informe técnico
  7. Disruptive seeds: a scenario approach to explore power shifts in sustainability transformations by Rutting, Lucas, Vervoort, Joost M., Mees, Heleen, Pereira, Laura, Veeger, Marieke, Muiderman, Karlijn, Mangnus, Astrid C, Winkler, Klara, Olsson, Per, Hichert, Tanja, Lane, Richard, Pergher, Bruno Bottega, Christiaens, Laura, Bansal, Nivedita, Hendriks, Abe, Driessen, Peter P.J.

    Published 2023
    “…It is a strong example of the value of mixing disciplinary perspectives to create new forms of scenario thinking—following the call for more integrated work on anticipatory governance that combines futures thinking with social and political science research into governance and power. Specifically, the questions about power shifts in transformations used in this paper to adapt the Seeds approach can also be used to adapt other future methods that similarly lack a focus on power shifts—for instance, explorative scenarios, classic back-casting approaches, and simulation gaming.…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those eleme... by Roe, D., Day, M., Booker, F., Zhou, W, Allebone-Webb, S., Hill, N.A.O, Wright, J, Rust, N, Sunderland, Terry C.H., Redford, K.H., Petrokofsky, G., Kümpel, N.F.

    Published 2014
    “…To undertake this, the systematic review will explore peer-reviewed research from the bibliographic databases SCOPUS, Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, AGRIS and AGRICOLA using search terms and Boolean search operators. …”
    Get full text
    Journal Article

Search Tools: