Resultados de búsqueda - "machine learning"

  1. Demand intelligence portal - annotated wireframe documentation por Sartas, M., Konlambigue, M.

    Publicado 2025
    Materias: “…machine learning…”
    Enlace del recurso
    Informe técnico
  2. Comprehensive nutrient analysis in agricultural organic amendments through non-destructive assays using machine learning por Towett, Erick K., Drake, L. B., Acquah, G. E., Haefele, S. M., McGrath, S. P., Shepherd, Keith D.

    Publicado 2020
    “…Two types of machine learning methods, forest regression and extreme gradient boosting, were used with data from both pXRF and DRIFT-MIR spectroscopy. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Journal Article
  3. Coupling Process-Based Models and Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Yield and Evapotranspiration of Maize in Arid Environments por Attia, Ahmed, Govind, Ajit, Qureshi, Asad Sarwar, Feike, Til, Rizk, Mosa Sayed, Shabana, Mahmoud Mohamed Abd ElHay, Kheir, Ahmed M.S.

    Publicado 2024
    “…Crop models (CMs) are powerful tools for predicting yield and water use, but they still have some limitations and uncertainties; therefore, combining them with machine learning algorithms (MLs) could improve predictions and reduce uncertainty. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Journal Article
  4. A simple algorithm outperforms a machine learning approach for quantifying spittlebug damage in tropical grasses por Ruiz-Hurtado, Andres Felipe, Espitia, Paula, Cardoso, Juan Andres, Jauregui, Rosa Noemi

    Publicado 2024
    “…The objective of this study was to compare a simple algorithm (Heckbert’s median-cut colour quantisation) with the k-means unsupervised machine learning approach for quantification of plant damage (green/chlorotic leaf tissue) by spittlebugs using colour images. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Póster
  5. Yield prediction models for some wheat varieties with satellite-based drought indices and machine learning algorithms por Cem Akcapınar, M., Cakmak, B.

    Publicado 2025
    “…In obtaining the input parameters for the models, the growth periods of the varieties in the region were also considered. Using various machine learning algorithms, 21 yield prediction models for Bayraktar-2000, 12 for Kızıltan-91 and 8 for Bezostaya-1 were presented as alternatives, with model performances (coefficient of determination, R2) ranging between 0.74 and 0.97, 0.73 and 0.96, and 0.69 and 0.87, respectively.…”
    Enlace del recurso
    Journal Article

Herramientas de búsqueda: