Similar Items: Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal's Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014
- Can authority change through deliberative politics? Lessons from the four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal
- Critical action research and social movements: revitalizing participation and deliberation for democratic empowerment
- REDD+ policy making in Nepal: toward state-centric, polycentric, or market-oriented governance?
- Gender Equality as an Entitlement: An Assessment of the UN Women's Report on Gender Equality and Sustainable Development 2014
- Gender, Migration and Forest Governance: Re-Thinking Community Forestry Policies in Nepal
- UN Women's evaluation of the SDGs: what is the role for the CGIAR?
Author: Ojha, H.R.
- Drivers of Forests and Tree-based Systems for Food Security and Nutrition
- Deliberation or symbolic violence?: the governance of community forestry in Nepal
- Drivers of Forests and Tree-based Systems for Food Security and Nutrition
- Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal's Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014
- Public Sector, Private Sector and Socio-Cultural Response Options
- Critical action research and social movements: revitalizing participation and deliberation for democratic empowerment
Author: Khatri, D.B.
- REDD+, transformational change and the promise of performance-based payments: a qualitative comparative analysis
- The context of REDD+ in Nepal: Drivers, agents, and institutions
- Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal's Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014
- REDD+ readiness in Nepal: In search of effective stakeholder participation
- Only money talks: how REDD+ discourses in the Nepalese media overlook the politics of policy making and governance
- REDD+ politics in the media: a case from Nepal