Similar Items: Livelihood implications of in situ conservation strategies of wild fruit tree species in Uzbekistan
- Livelihood implications of in situ-on farm conservation strategies of fruit species in Uzbekistan
- Good practices of in-situ conservation of tropical fruit tree species diversity: linking conservation and livelihood.
- Harnessing the diversity of wild relatives of tropical fruit tree species for sustainable livelihoods
- Conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity of fruit crops and wild fruit species. Proceedings of International scientific and practical conference, 23-26 August 2011, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
- Tropical fruit tree species and climate change
- Local diversity of fruit, nut trees and grapevine as basis of organic horticulture development in Uzbekistan
Author: Gotor, Elisabetta
- Home gardens, household nutrition and income in rural farm households in Odisha, India
- Conserving landraces and improving livelihoods: how to assess the success of on-farm conservation projects?
- Andean ‘lost grains’ in Bolivia and Peru
- Climbing to Zero Hunger with crop biodiversity
- CGIAR Initiative on Foresight & Metrics Overview & Update
- Initial investment in diversity is the efficient thing to do for resilient forest landscape restoration
Author: Caracciolo, Francesco
- Conserving landraces and improving livelihoods: how to assess the success of on-farm conservation projects?
- Towards a core approach for cross-sectional farm household survey data collection: a tiered setup for quantifying key farm and livelihood indicators
- Assessing the benefits of Andean crop diversity on farmers' livelihood: insights from a development programme in Bolivia and Peru
- Yield perceptions, determinants and adoption impact of on farm varietal mixtures for common bean and banana in Uganda
- The perceived impact of the In Trust Agreements on CGIAR germplasm availability: An assessment of Bioversity International’s institutional activities
- Guidelines and best practices for on-farm conservation projects: designing and evaluating interventions