Ejemplares similares: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) “Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact”
- Linking transdisciplinary research characteristics and quality to effectiveness: A comparative analysis of five research-for-development projects
- How to build Theories of Change for transdisciplinary research: Guidance and considerations
- A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research
- Leading inter- and transdisciplinary research: Lessons from applying theories of change to a strategic research program
- The legitimacy of precision livestock farming
- Improving credibility and transparency of conservation impact evaluations through the partial identification approach
Autor: Belcher, B.
- Finding appropriate definitions and measures of research quality for transdisciplinary and applied natural resource management research: a systematic review protocol
- The role of bamboo plantations in rural development: the case of Anji County, Zhejiang, China
- Developing community-based forest enterprises in Nepal
- Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples
- Wood, fuelwood, and non-wood forest products
- Development of a village-level livelihood monitoring tool: a case-study in Viengkham District, Lao PDR
Autor: Ramírez, L.F.
- Stakeholder perceptions of scientific knowledge in policy processes: A Peruvian case-study of forestry policy development
- A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) “Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact”
- Crossing the science-policy interface: Lessons from a research project on Brazil nut management in Peru
- Linking transdisciplinary research characteristics and quality to effectiveness: A comparative analysis of five research-for-development projects